How to read the government availability map
The federal broadband map is the official word on who can get what. It's useful, but it's built from provider-reported service areas, statistical households and a 75% rule, and in our view it tends to make coverage look better than it is.
Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada (ISED) publishes the National Broadband Data, collected with the CRTC and documented on its Universal Broadband Fund pages. It’s open data, and this site uses it on the home map and every community page.
Hexagons and roads
Hexagons of roughly 25 square kilometres report only 50/10 and 5/1; one marked 5/1 may have faster service. Road segments about 250 metres long get the best tier reported along them: 50/10, 25/5, 10/2, 5/1 or none. Our community pages use the wired roads layer (cable, DSL and fibre); fixed wireless, cellular and satellite aren’t counted. A tier counts only when both download and upload are met.
Top: three hexagons, each about 25 square kilometres, shaded by the only tiers the hexagon layer reports: 50/10, 5/1, none. The hexagon layer's scope is unspecified in the data dictionary. The hexagon layer only reports 50/10 and 5/1; a hex marked 5/1 may have faster service below 50/10. Bottom: a road chopped into segments of about 250 metres, each shaded by the best tier reported along it: 50/10, 25/5, 10/2, 5/1, none. The roads layer used here is wired only (cable, DSL and fibre); none means no wired service reported, and fixed wireless, cellular and satellite are not counted.
The 75% rule
A hexagon gets a tier when more than 75% of households in it can get that speed, so one shaded 50/10 can have up to a quarter without it. ISED says it’s possible not every household has access to the service indicated. In a rural hexagon, in our view, that quarter is likely the farms and acreages at the end of the line.
A hexagon with 20 households along its roads. 16 of them, along the main road and a short lane, can get 50/10; that is 80%, more than 75%, so the whole hexagon is shaded 50/10. The other 4, down a lane near the edge of the hexagon, can't. A note marked as our view says those are likely the farms and acreages at the end of the line.
Modelled homes, reported footprints
Instead of real addresses, the data uses pseudo-households: statistical locations from Census counts, placed along roads; ISED says it’s accurate to within 250 metres in most cases.
A provider's reported service footprint covers part of a road. A modelled household sits on the road inside the footprint, so the road segment of about 250 metres next to it shows 50/10. A real house down a lane that branches from that served segment, outside the footprint, can't order the service. A note says ISED describes the data as accurate to within 250 metres in most cases.
Service areas are those publicly advertised and available, as reported by facilities-based providers. ISED doesn’t run speed tests for it. So a footprint can include homes needing a new drop, or where equipment is full; tiers are plan speeds, and on DSL real speed falls with the length of the copper line. ISED says providers correct their data directly through the CRTC. We haven’t found a process on ISED’s page for a household to challenge its own square.
In our view, it overstates availability
In our view, the errors mostly run one way: the 75% rule rounds up, modelled households smear coverage along roads, footprints are generous and plan speeds are best cases. None is dishonest alone; together they make the map look better than reality, especially outside cities. In Sturgeon County, Cybera found mapped 50/10 where speed tests showed under 5/1. In rural southern Alberta, RMA speed tests in 2022 typically came in around 19/2, against the 50/10 target.
Using it well
Check the retrieval date on each map: new builds take time to appear, and old claims linger. Ask whether fibre goes all the way to the building (coax vs DSL vs fibre). The About page explains how to send a correction.
Sources
- National Broadband Data, Open Government Portal (ISED)
- ISED, National Broadband Data information
- Cybera, State of Alberta Digital Infrastructure Report (2021): the Sturgeon County case study
- Rural Municipalities of Alberta, Internet Speed Testing Summary Report (November 2022)
- Wikipedia, Digital subscriber line (general background on distance and speed)